Retirement, pension and retirement fund of cordoba increase
The Caja de Jubilaciones, Pensiones y Retiros de Córdoba orders the transfer of assets in foreign currency (according to the place of residence) to the bank account informed by the beneficiary.
Beneficiaries residing abroad must complete the «Declaration of Resident Abroad» form, which must be requested at firstname.lastname@example.org, and send it back to the same address signed and scanned.
The cost for the Beneficiary residing abroad is from thirty dollars to forty-five dollars (U$S 30 to U$S 45) which will be deducted from the amount of the benefit prior to the transfer of the benefit.
The presentation of the «Declaration of Resident Abroad» Form, operates as the first proof of proof of life, since the consular authority certifies the signature (a very personal procedure), making this act a faithful accreditation of survival on the part of the certifying authority.
Retirement and pension fund
Province of Córdoba. Gross Income Tax. Financial entities. Solidarity Fund for Coverage and Financing of Imbalances of the Retirement, Pension and Retirement Fund. Res. Norm. D.G.R. 1/17. Its modification.
Art. 1 – To incorporate, after art. 369.10 of Res. Norm. D.G.R. 1/17 and its amendments -published in the Official Gazette dated 24/7/17-, item 34 with the title and article transcribed below:
Section 369.11 – The mandatory contribution provided for in Title IV of Law 10,724, to be made by the institutions subject to the regime of National Law 21. 526 -of Financial Institutions- as taxpayers of the gross income tax as from the advance payment of January 2021, shall be declared in the SiFeRe Web System through the concept ‘FOCCA’ included in ‘Other debits’, applying the rate of twenty eight point fifty seven percent (28.57%) on the tax determined for each monthly advance payment».
SOCIAL SECURITY EMERGENCY LAW – TERMINATION OF THE EMERGENCY – ABSTRACT ISSUE – ACQUIRED RIGHTS – LEGISLATIVE RECEPTION OF JUDGMENT OF THE SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE – EFFECTS – PRECAUTIONARY MEASURES – SUSPENSION OF PRECAUTIONARY MEASURES – CONSTITUTIONALITY – SOCIAL SECURITY CREDIT – COMPENSATION PROCEDURE – SECURITIES OF SOCIAL SECURITY CANCELLATION.
1) If the emergency ended on July thirty-first, two thousand and twelve, it is not necessary for the Court to pronounce on the appeals filed for the period after the aforementioned date, and it is only necessary to analyze the parties’ arguments and the challenged judgment for the limited period of time during which the emergency lasted. 2) If the emergency ended on July thirty-first, two thousand and twelve, it is not necessary for the Court to pronounce on the appeals filed for the period after the aforementioned date.
3) The interpretation that the Supreme Court of Justice is currently making in the «Iglesias» or «Hernández» cases is only valid for those who are plaintiffs in such cases, it does not have erga omnes effects, nor can it annul or enervate the effects of the rulings of the previous Supreme Court itself, which on several occasions ratified the constitutionality of Decree No. 1777/95.
Retirement fund salary receipts
Cheble, Antonio – Beverina, Rolando – Peratta, Beatriz – Gavier Cabanillas, Gloria – Gavier, Arminda – Tomatis, Osvaldo – Molina, Manuel – Poli, Nella – Piccoli, Vilma – Rodríguez, Cristina – Valeto, c/ Caja de Jubilaciones, Pensiones y Retiros de Córdoba – Amparo Copy body Exp. No. 01521520/36
ECONOMIC EMERGENCY. Police power. Control of constitutionality. Crisis situation. Control of conventionality. Limits of emergency measures. RETIREMENT ASSETS. Irreducible minimum. Contributory system based on the principle of social solidarity. Social rights: Principle of progressivity and non-regression. Acquired rights. Titles of pension cancellation. Partial payment: Propriety. Precautionary measure: It is left without effect.
PENSION EMERGENCY. Laws 8472 and 8482. Decree 1777/95. RETIREMENT BENEFITS. Pensioner of the special regime for judges and officials of the Judiciary. Discounts. Unreasonableness. Regulatory excess of the Executive Branch. Principle of proportionality. Inappropriateness of the deduction.